Dr.
Norman Allan's Vol 3,
No. 1, |
*
newspaper clippings
|
||
* * *
|
||
A long sabbatical, but some of you have said they've missed the newsletter, so I'm going to try to send it out quarterly. |
||
* * *
|
||
"Global
Warming, The answer's underfoot, Soil is our best
carbon trapper - if only conventional agro weren't churning it up" This is an important article: organic farming is a carbon sink, industrial farming is a large carbon dioxide, greenhouse gas, producer - up to a third of the greenhouse gases! So the true cost of organic food, Kyoto adjusted, is similar to the agrobiz cost. "soil
is the global warming gas storage mother-lode, a sink that can hold about
three times more carbon than all the world's plants and trees (but
plants are part of this soil process, surely, or are we speaking exclusively
bacteria and humus here? I recall a figure [an image] that the bacteria
in an acre of soil weigh the equivalent of two elephants - meanwhile an
acre can support a cow, or a family) ... with one
proviso: that the soil is not disturbed by industrial-style farm equipment
and methods.
|
||
---|---|---|
* * * |
||
"...
vitamin D slashes risk of colorectal and breast malignancies" "...increasing daily intake of vitamin D could prevent the development of breast cancer by as much as half and that of colorectal cancer by nearly two-thirds. ...They found a two-third reduction in the incidence of colorectal cancer in those who took 2000 IU of vitamin D... 'There's really no downside to taking 2000 IU of vitamin D...' " Vitamin D is this years panacea. Good for all sorts of stuff. ("A growing body of work (and "meta-analysis) has shown that vitamin D in important in the prevention of heart disease, lung disease, cancer, diabetes, high blood pressure, schizophrenia and multiple sclerosis, and of course, osteoporosis.") And fibromyalgia. |
||
* * *
|
||
An interesting clipping that I've stumbled on since the last letter concerns vibration:(Globe and Mail, 13 June 2006) "SCIENTIST GETS VIBES TO BUILD BONES. Device to help space travelers approved to treat sufferers of osteoporosis." The device is a machine that generates vibrations - vibration implies acceleration/deceleration, and is therefore somewhat like gravity - therefore in theory, and it seems in practice, good for maintenance of bone mass in zero gravity (it was designed for use in space). On earth, the article says, "a person who stands on [the platform of the vibration device] for 20 minutes a day can build bone density an average of 2 percent a year. ... By sending small vibrations through the body - moving about 50 micrometers (or the thickness of a few human hairs) up and down and repeating at a rate of 34 cycles per second - the platform triggers musculoskeletal stimulations that naturally occur... the vibrations from the platform are set to a frequency that [generates acceleration that] is one-third that of gravity... and is therefore safe. Other devices (exercise machines) which generate 4 to 15 gravities are dangerous, we are told. The thing that I find interesting here is that a relatively subtle vibration is having an appreciable (positive) effect on body metabolism and function. I am therefore wondering what the vibrational effects of chanting, OM, for instance, are? We'd need an engineer to tell us about the difference in order of magnitude between that devise and the vibrations that are set up in your body by, a) a rock band in a bar, b) by chanting, OM for instance. However, orders of magnitude might or might not be of relevance here. Subtle vibrations may be having physiological effects. One would have to look and see. Meanwhile, the safe course would be to do the chanting. It's bound to have salubrious effects at many levels (if not bone mass and muscle mass - muscles, that too was in the article). ("Salubrious" = health promoting - forgive the use of a relatively obscure word.) "Over all the bone density of the controlled group (the reporter has got this wrong - he means "experimental group" as compared to the control group) increased by 3 percent during a year, and muscle mass improved by 4 percent." So get chanting, OM (or what you fancy). |
||
* * *
|
||
Dr. Norman Allan's Newsletter, May 2006: snippets from newspapers, various, which I hope are of interest. Dr. Norman Allan's Newsletter, April 2006: as above Dr. Norman Allan's Newsletter, March 2006: Dr. Norman Allan's Newsletter, February 2006: Dr. Norman Allan's Newsletter, January 2006: Dr. Norman Allan's Newsletter, December 2005: Dr. Norman Allan's Newsletter, November: 2005 Dr. Norman Allan's Newsletter, October: 2005 Dr. Norman Allan's Newsletter, August/September: 2005 Dr. Norman Allan's Newsletter, June/July 2005: Dr. Norman Allan's Newsletter, May 2005: Dr. Norman Allan's Newsletter, March/April 2005: an essay on immune tonics published in "Healthy Directions" - and snippets from newspapers, various, which I hope are of interest. Dr.
Norman Allan's Newsletter, February 2005: snippets from newspapers,
various, which I hope are of interest - and a discussion of "C Reactive
Protein" as an indicator of risk for heart disease. |
||
* * *
|
||
I
am now a regular guest, on line, on
That Radio's liquid lunch program at 1:30 on the second Tuesday
of each month. I'm also a guest on Mark Scott's program, mascott,
from 11 to 12 am on the fourth Wednesday of each month - also on That
Radio. If you have any medical/alternative medicine questions, e-mail
me and I will answer them on "that radio", or on my ask the
doctor page (as you wish). |
||
Not new,but still noteworthy:- | ||